# FILE NAME: 00000666.soc # TITLE: Should the BBC be funded by tax-payer money? [e07cd65d78b83c68a5acf5e25aa0e502] # DESCRIPTION: # DATA TYPE: soc # MODIFICATION TYPE: original # RELATES TO: # RELATED FILES: # PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12 # MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12 # NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4 # NUMBER VOTERS: 5 # NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 5 # ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - In general, the BBC should not be funded by the tax-payer. The BBC is a very large organisation, and has many different functions. Some of these functions, such as providing a news service, should be funded by the tax-payer, as it is important for democracy that there is a neutral news service that can report on political issues. However, other functions of the BBC, such as entertainment programmes, should not be funded by the tax-payer, as this is not in the public interest. It should be noted that the BBC does provide many services that are not funded by the tax-payer, such as radio services, which are funded by subscription. # ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - In general, the BBC should not be funded by the tax-payer. The BBC is a very large organisation, and has many different functions. Some of these functions, such as providing a news service, should be funded by the tax-payer, as it is important for democracy that there is a neutral news service that can report on political issues. However, other functions of the BBC, such as entertainment programmes, should not be funded by the tax-payer, as this is not in the public interest. The group of participants also agreed to the following set of reasons in support of the final consensus statement: Reasons: The BBC is a very large organisation, and has many different functions. Some of these functions, such as providing a news service, should be funded by the tax-payer, as it is important for democracy that there is a neutral news service that can report on political issues. However, other functions of the BBC, such as entertainment programmes, should not be funded by the tax-payer, as this is not in the public interest. A group of participants was tasked with coming up with a consensus opinion on an important question. Below is presented the question, # ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - The BBC should be funded by the tax-payer. It is important that the BBC is funded by the tax-payer, as it is important for democracy that there is a neutral news service that can report on political issues. However, this does not mean that the BBC should be funded by the tax-payer for all of its services. The BBC provides a wide range of services, including news, entertainment, and educational programmes. We think that the BBC should be funded by the tax-payer for its news service, but not for its entertainment or educational programmes. # ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - The BBC is a very large organisation, and has many different functions. Some of these functions, such as providing a news service, should be funded by the tax-payer, as it is important for democracy that there is a neutral news service that can report on political issues. However, other functions of the BBC, such as entertainment programmes, should not be funded by the tax-payer, as this is not in the public interest. 1: 4,1,2,3 1: 3,4,1,2 1: 1,4,3,2 1: 1,3,4,2 1: 2,1,4,3